In disagreement with the Senate, the executive puts “an end to the constitutional revision process” on the climate, on which Emmanuel Macron wanted a referendum
Jean Castex announced Tuesday that the executive, in disagreement with the Senate, was putting “an end to the constitutional review process” on the climate, on which Emmanuel Macron wanted a referendum after following the recommendations of the Citizen’s Convention for the climate.
The Senate, with a right-wing majority, adopted Monday at second reading a wording different from that voted by the Assembly and supported by the government, around the inclusion in the Constitution in particular of “preservation of the environment”.
Climate: the IPCC snapshot of an unlivable future
Made public on June 23, leaks of an IPCC working document on climate change predict terrible impacts on our societies. The intergovernmental body warns against hasty conclusions. It will publish the first part of its report in August
“The climate emergency is here, the risk is real”
Believing to have taken “a step” in the direction of the Senate by amending the text marginally, Jean Castex lamented that “this outstretched hand” was “not seized” by the upper assembly on Monday by rewriting it again. “It is deeply regrettable but the fight continues”, he hammered, after being challenged by the deputy LREM Pieyre-Alexandre Anglade.
According to the latest version approved by the Assembly, it was a question of inscribing that the French Republic “guarantees the preservation of the environment and biological diversity and acts against climate change”. The Senate for its part proposed to write that the French Republic “acts for the preservation of the environment and biological diversity and against climate change, under the conditions provided for by the Environmental Charter of 2004”.
While each camped on its positions, and even though the shuttle between the two chambers could have continued as much as necessary, the executive therefore chose Tuesday to close the ban. “The climate emergency is there, the risk is real,” Jean Castex stressed on Tuesday, criticizing those who “refuse to see reality in the face” and others who “favor an ideological, maximalist approach”. “At the same time, we make the choice of ambition and the choice of pragmatism, that is to say the choice of efficiency”, he defended.